This is part two of a longer part series, that we kicked off last week with The trouble with AI. This header is more of a word play, AI itself is not trouble, but how it is used is troubling. Also usually when you ask a normal person so many questions, it can be seen as a bit bothersome. So I troubled AI with a whole lot of data an delved into holding the gallery accountable. But also the AI is a tool and when you feed it data that is questionable, what will it give you back?
Tascha Sciarone, Art Historian
Recap
If you did not want to (re)read The trouble with AI. Here is a quick recap. I asked AI to hold me accountable if we are fair in our pricing. As this thought process was started by AI being used as a wealth extraction tool. So I fed ChatGPT all the information I have about the art and artists at the gallery. All the information buyers would be able to find. The analysis of AI was that I was asking a fair price, considering the size, medium and career of the artist. However, it followed up with needing more market data. Like for example, what are similar art pieces selling for or what the artworks of the artist had sold for. I added, we should probably add art market reports by Art Basel, and TEFAF's Art Market Report reporting. As we are in a cost of living crisis amongst other global shifts. I also concluded, that my ChatGPT may have been influenced by previous prompts of mine, where I asked it to check if articles I had written several years prior had any missing information. All those articles were about the value and pricing of art.
Critique
On the basis of the previous post, we got some gentle critique. It was gently given, but also very important. One housing that prompted this, is a basic human right. Art is a luxury item. The second critique built on this. It seems a bit crass to think about art and money while the world is seemingly burning. We are so thankful for everyone who has engaged with us. We are always open to thoughts and ideas. I would like to say that they have a lot to do with each other once we consider housing and art in Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Pyramid
Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. - Arts of Thought
Hierarchy of Needs: Housing vs Art
Art and Housing are not remotely connected, art is wholly unimportant in the grander scheme if there is no shelter. Here is Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Pyramid. Which is used to understand that the base of the pyramid needs to be fulfilled, before the pieces on the top. People without shelter on the base, or security one tier above are not thinking about art. It might even be crass to talk about luxury products like art and art sales. Where art is in the period, in the Esteem Needs or Self Actualization is debatable. For some people art is a prestige item. For other people it helps regulate their safety need when making it. For others it in the Self Actualization tier. It really depends on the lense you view art from. Regardless, an unstable housing situation, immediately effect ones quality of life and only once that it is stable and actualised will people consider fulfilling other needs in their life. So no matter the lens, when paying for your shelter and only your shelter effects your ability to think about other needs.
The price gauging of renters, directly effect them and other industries.
But they were right, there is a real systematic problem within capitalism and wealth extraction and art seems to many to be also a tool to extract wealth. Which I answer in several other articles.
What should I do if I cannot afford buying art?
How does art fit into your life?
But I would also like to answer here, I believe in the ownership in the means of production. That means, that at the gallery we work in the principle that everyone gets paid for their work. Sometimes it comes in with waves and other times we are in drought for several months. It is not reliable or fun way to live, but it is based on equity. Many galleries take advantage of artists and those who wish to work in the arts, but similarly artists undervalue the amount of financial and physical labour that goes into the selling of their art. And at the end of this, if no-one buys art, no-one is paid. No one is obliged to buy art, most of it is viewable for free digitally or when we have shows. Like Anti-virus software, most people make use of the free version and the company relies on less than 1% of their user base to be paying customers base. Which I also hope answers the second critique. Art is many things, but no-one is pressuring you to buy it and in most cases experiencing it is free, especially on the level we operate at the gallery.
We are grateful for everyone who took the time to engage, the Anthropologist in me is saving these multiple little conversations and moments of connection here. Now feeding AI more data points from the actual world we live in, and not just the information surrounding the artwork and we will see how that influences the prices.
Feeding the Data
So we will be giving Chat GPT the same prompt: "You are an art appraiser, please make a realistic price for the following painting: "followed by all the texts written about the artwork either by me or other art historians. We will also first feed it the market reports mentioned above as well as our own final sales prices for the 150+ art pieces we have sold the last 5 years. As we have told people in person, after February 2022, we have been mainly selling pieces under €500,00 where previously we were mostly selling pieces in the €2,500-€4,500 price range. So with all the new data, are we still asking realistic prices.
Art Market Reports
Reassessing Art Prices
Now that we have fed the data, reread the data, analyzed the data, critiqued the data. This article has become too long. We will delve into how the data of the larger art market impacts the price of art at the gallery next week. Again I look forward to any and all feedback. I hope all the artist at the gallery, other gallerist, and just anyone with an interest in art and the "art world'' enjoys the information gathered here. As we see from the data, cautious optimism is the red thread. And as we have mentioned earlier, these reports also function to make collectors and investors in the diverse markets feel safe and willing to spend. They acknowledge that there are economic and geopolitical factors that influence the market, without actually delving into how this affects buyers behaviour as more and more people's money has to be spent on housing and food in even the richest economies. Which ties into the critique we also received.
Until next week, Love,
Tascha Sciarone
Art Historian, but as you can
see in this article not an academic.
Art Historian Tascha Sciarone with an oil painitng by artist
Marko Klomp from his Anthologima series.
Add comment
Comments